"We're not extracting a finite resource from the sea bed of the ocean floor. We are putting wind turbines up that are tapping the inexhaustible abundant supply of wind off our shore. But if, in fact, congress deems that we should pay a royalty payment or a lease payment, we will.". Cape wind isn't the only proposed wind farm off the Atlantic coast. From Massachusetts to virginia, developers are staking their claims to build more offshore generators. But none of the other proposals have generated as much anger or opposition as Cape wind.
How many wind turbines it would take to power the
Compare the wind farm to offshore oil drilling. The government has put whole sections of the outer continental shelf out of bounds for drilling, but not for wind farms. Oil companies have to bid for leases and face major hurdles before they can explore or develop an oil field, which can take up to 10 years. Cape wind wants to do it in half that time. "i've seen grocery stores take longer to get permitted on Cape cod than this project will take says Rosen. "That should tell you something.". And then there's the question of money. Last year, oil companies paid the federal government 5 billion to drill offshore. Gordon would pay nothing to build his wind towers in public waters. "We're different says Gordon.
It's why a quarter of a million people live here on Cape cod and why people come here by the millions. It's a precious resource. I think this project is just too big and it's in the wrong place.". Gordon says the wind towers would only be a blip on the horizon — barely visible when viewed from the nearest beach. Opponents paint a very different picture. "The developers have a financial interest in saying that these are going to be unobtrusive on any number of fronts says Issac Rosen, who heads an alliance that's fighting the wind farm project. As much as how opponents objects to the size of the project, what really bothers them is the way cape wind has taken advantage of existing laws. "developers are doing much what 19th century speculators did in the west says Rosen. "They are finding tracts of land, tracts of water, recognizing that there are no regulations governing usage or development, sticking a shovel in it and saying, 'i'm going to take this and I'm going to make money off.
His proposed Cape wind project is something environmental-minded Cape codders would normally support. Rob o'leary represents the cape cod region. He points to how a 200-foot weather tower that Gordon mother built in the middle of the proposed wind farm. It's half as tall as the wind turbines. O'leary says he support wind power in principle, just not at that location. "The problem is that they're going to be visible. And they're going to be visible at night and they're going to be visible during the day and they're going to be lit up says o'leary. "It's a big problem. Nantucket sound is a unique place.
But the idea has raised a storm among some residents, because gordon wants to build his windmills in the middle of Nantucket sound. His vision is to build windmills with 130 wind turbines. Each would reach 400 feet to the top of the propeller — taller than the Statue of Liberty. And they would be spread over 24 square miles, making it the nation's first - and one of the world's largest - off shore wind farms. "Mother Nature dictates where you site a wind farm, and Nantucket sound has some of the best wind resources in the United States says Gordon. "It is an optimal site to locate a wind farm that can produce at peak output all of the electrical requirements of the cape and islands, without any pollution emissions, without any water consumption and zero waste discharge.". Gordon is a developer who made a fortune building clean-burning natural gas power plants.
Reaping the wind with the biggest turbines ever made - bbc news
Calum Macdonald, a smart former mp who backs an expansion of community-owned wind power, said the turbine size was staggering. Edf has said there would be no case for more community windfarms without a new power cable to the mainland. The lab estimated 780m investment needed for such an interconnector would only be justified by electricity generation on the scale proposed by edf. After several years of not backing support for any onshore windfarms, the government last year threw its weight behind schemes built on remote islands such as Lewis. Wind power developers fighting in auctions for government subsidies across Europe are increasingly dependent on scale to win contracts by bidding with the lowest subsidy price. The next uk auction is scheduled for spring 2019.
Will Collins, the project manager for edfs Lewis wind power venture, said: we want to assess the potential for us to consider using larger turbines in order to make the projects as competitive as possible. It reads like a summer novel. The location is one of the nation's prized resort areas, comprising Cape cod, martha's Vineyard and Nantucket - playgrounds for the wealthy and powerful. Cbs news Correspondent Randall Pinkston reports Jim Gordon has an idea that's shaking things up in these new England communities. He's a developer who wants to use wind power to replace electric power plants and the pollution they cause. "Wind mills are an icon on the cape and islands he says. "so, what we're doing is kind of going back to the future and addressing the present day problems that we have now, such as global warming and climate change, by building a clean, green, renewable energy project.".
Edf energy has said its plans for two major windfarms on the Isle of Lewis may need to reach heights normally the preserve of turbines at sea, prompting an outcry from local opponents. The French companys renewables unit said it may need to go higher for the project to be economically viable and win millions of pounds in government subsidies. Kerry macPhee, who heads community liaison, told locals that one of the windfarms could be 200 metres (650ft) tall, with the other 187 metres, up from 150 metres and 145 metres previously. That would be taller than the uks largest existing onshore turbine (193.5 metres) and be on a par with some of the worlds most powerful offshore wind turbines, which are 60 metres taller than the london eye. MacPhee said the potential changes were designed to increase the projects chances of winning future auctions for low-carbon electricity and unlock substantial benefits for Lewis.
Edf said it was likely, but not guaranteed, that fewer turbines would be needed than the original 36 planned. Bigger turbines would also require a new application for planning approval, allowing opponents a chance to air their opinions. Windfarms height graph, critics remain unimpressed, however. Four crofting groups have been battling edfs proposal, arguing that local people would benefit more if the islands wind resource was harnessed by community-owned turbines. Rhoda macKenzie, a spokesperson for the crofters, said: Its going to have a detrimental effect on tourism. The largest wind turbines in the uk? I hardly think thats going to bring people here. Sign up to the daily business Today email or follow guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk.
Iowa's biggest economic project ever:.9b wind turbine plan
But Cameron remains under pressure from backbenchers to reduce support for onshore windfarms over planning concerns and the level of subsidies on household bills. In november, the sun and the daily mail said he ordered aides to "get rid of all the green crap" from energy bills to bring down costs. According to the reports, cameron used the direct language to dismiss green levies, which go towards paying for renewables and helping poor people cut energy use. At the time, no 10 denied the report, saying it did not recognise the language when asked about the phrase "green crap". However, officials did not appear to deny the sentiment, pointing out that the pm has repeatedly promised to roll back green taxes. The coalition has now scrapped environmental levies amounting to 50 a year per household if the cuts are for passed on by energy companies. There are fears within the green industry that the government will come under further pressure to cut environmental levies to pay for energy efficiency and low-carbon power.
In public, the essays government claims it supports onshore wind energy as long as communities have more power of veto over unwanted developments. Asked about whether Cameron proposed a cap on onshore output when meeting Clegg, the prime minister's spokesman refused to answer the question four times. He told reporters: "Cameron and Clegg meet very regularly and I don't go into the details of what they discuss. We want local communities to have a greater say in the planning decisions with regards to onshore windfarms and changes were made in recent months to strengthen local communities' involvement in those decisions.". The latest row comes months after the government agreed that subsidies for onshore turbines would be cut by 5 a year after 2015 under a deal reached by the coalition partners. In 2012, support for onshore wind was cut by 10 after the prime minister came under pressure from more than 100 backbench MPs, who wrote to him demanding action against windfarms spoiling the landscape in rural areas. The government also announced extra planning restrictions, with Eric Pickles, the communities secretary, promising to "give local communities a greater say" on where windfarms were built. Surveys consistently show public support for windfarms and green energy, even among Tory and ukip voters.
of thousands of British jobs.". There are more than 4,000 onshore wind turbines generating almost 5 of all of electricity, and 3,000 more have planning approval. As well as restricting any more turbines beyond these, the senior Tory source said other options were further cuts to subsidies aimed at making it more economically difficult for current windfarms to operate and extra controls on planning permission. The green industry reacted with dismay to the news that the conservatives are planning a new assault on onshore wind. Maf Smith, deputy chief executive of Renewable uk, the industry lobby group, said the row risked harming investment across the energy sector. "Onshore wind is the cheapest mainstream renewable technology, and will be cheaper than new nuclear he said. "Rumours like this make the uk look a less secure place to invest.".
Nick Clegg just over a week ago, meaning no more would be built beyond existing ones and those already international granted permission. The idea of an effective moratorium on more onshore wind first reported by the bbc was rejected by the lib Dems. But the source's comments show the prime minister is considering whether to go further with a manifesto commitment to cap or dismantle some onshore windfarms. This would allow the tories to go into next year's election claiming the lib Dems have blocked their efforts to restrict turbines and make a pitch to core tory voters about cutting back support for windfarms if they win. The move was confirmed by a lib Dem aide, who said Tory claims to be green were "already a lame duck and are now dead in the water". Clegg told Cameron he was perfectly free to put the idea of greater curbs on windfarms in the next Conservative manifesto but it would absolutely not be sanctioned under the coalition, the source said. "Nick Clegg was simply not going to allow the tories to move the goalposts on green energy again the source added. "Some sort of crude block towards onshore wind would seriously damage investor confidence in Britain's energy markets. It would be a double whammy bad for both British business and for the environment.
Wind turbine - designing buildings wiki
David Cameron is considering whether to go into the general election promising new restrictions thesis on onshore windfarms as influential Tories launch an attempt to rid the countryside of turbines, a senior source close to the prime minister said. The conservative source indicated that Cameron is "of one mind" with some of the loudest opponents of onshore windfarms and wants to "go further" in cutting financial aid for them. The source suggested that this might be done through a cap on the onshore turbines' output, lower subsidies or tighter planning restrictions. Despite the government's official public backing for onshore wind, the senior Tory said Cameron was coming under pressure to make a manifesto commitment on wind energy from some within his party. Critics not only want controls on the number of new turbines being built but to begin dismantling existing ones they see as a "blot on the countryside". Although the coalition has already set out cuts to financial support for windfarms and given communities greater rights to veto developments, downing Street plans for further curbs are already under way. It is understood that Cameron and george Osborne proposed a cap on the electricity output of onshore wind farms.